What we do without always saying it. What we say without really doing it.
In human systems — families, institutions, organisations — strategy is not a plan you unroll. It is an art of manoeuvring in uncertainty, a subtle adjustment at the heart of complexity.
It is neither authoritarian — an order given from outside — nor sacrificial — a self-giving that exhausts — nor dogmatic — the application of a model. It is interactional, adaptive, recursive.
What am I activating right now? At which logical level am I intervening? Am I co-constructing a possibility, or imposing a script?
Strategy comes from the Greek strategos: the general, but also the art of governing. From a systemic and post-modern perspective, the point is no longer to command but to compose. To compose with constraints, tensions, resistances. With the system’s own timings. With uncertainty.
A successful strategy is often invisible. It does not need to be named to be effective. You recognise it by its effects: a system that starts moving again, speech that circulates, a symptom that loses its function, a hypothesis that becomes operative.
Strategy belongs to mētis, the supple and cunning intelligence of the ancient Greeks: neither force nor flight, but bifurcation. It takes the detours needed to open ways out where everything seems closed.
It is not cynical for all that. It is anchored in an ethics of the bond. Neither missionary — wanting to convince — nor sacrificially altruistic — wanting to save — but operational: it intervenes from within, with precision of fit.
What counts is not what is said but how, to whom, and in what context. Strategy is not the application of a model but a way of reading and intervening in the system.
It acts not through force but through form: a word, a hypothesis shifts the lines more surely than an action plan. It is an active listening to the implicit structure of interactions, resistances and dormant potentials.
A silent adolescent girl, her parents at a loss. The therapist does not ask why she is not speaking. He says to the mother: “What if your daughter were protecting you from something?”
In one sentence the scene changes register. The symptom becomes a message. The silence becomes a bond. That is strategy: bringing meaning into view rather than designating a problem.
The Chinese speak of shi: the disposition of forces. Strategy does not confront, it marries the flow. It does not seek to convince, but to create resonance. It does not resist resistances: it uses them.
It is a way of acting with the system, never against it.
Filling a lack. Closing the gap. Applying an off-the-shelf solution. Convincing. Saving.
Revealing a fertile gap. Working the tension between a lived state and a desired one, between a frozen narrative and a possibility still unformulated.
It is less a solution than a commitment: working the gap rather than closing it.
In a world hungry for off-the-shelf solutions, systemic strategy is an invitation to slow down, to listen, to defuse differently. It reminds us that change cannot be decreed: it is cultivated.
Preferring the weave to the plan, presence to power, the spiral to the straight line.
To think strategy is to think of the human being as a living system: fragile, intelligent, sometimes recalcitrant, sometimes magnificent, always becoming. It means agreeing to dance with the system rather than crush it.
Doumit, Y. (2025). Strategy: the invisible art of systemic change. Complexe Systémique. https://www.complexe-systemique.com
Comments 0
Log in to join the discussion. Log in