Palo Alto · Double bind
The invisible trap of communication: understanding the double bind
In the vast field of psychology, certain concepts prove crucial for deciphering the complex dynamics of human communication. The double bind describes a phenomenon in which a person receives two contradictory messages, each carrying great weight, but where obeying one makes obeying the other impossible.
Definition and origin of the concept
This concept, developed in the 1950s by Gregory Bateson and his team, continues to enlighten mental health professionals on the intricacies of human relationships.
The double bind arises mainly in relational contexts where the individual cannot escape the contradiction without consequences. These contradictory messages may be verbal or non-verbal, and they often place the recipient in a position where resolving the conflict without outside help is impossible. This communicational pattern is particularly observed in families, where power dynamics often exacerbate these tensions.
Psychological impact
The implications of the double bind run deep. They can lead to considerable stress and to a confusion which, in some cases, contributes to the development of psychological disorders. For those who regularly live under such constraints, it can produce pathological relational patterns, in which paradox becomes an expected and inevitable norm.
Three everyday examples
1
In the family
Léa, a teenager, receives contradictory messages from her father about expressing tiredness: he expects her to succeed without showing weakness, while criticising any sign of stress. Léa finds herself trapped, unable to meet expectations without sacrificing her emotional well-being.
2
In the couple
Amélie and Jules, a married couple, experience the double bind when Jules asks Amélie to be more independent… while criticising her personal initiatives. This double message creates tension and confusion about the roles and expectations within their relationship.
3
At work
Éric, an employee at a start-up, is encouraged to be innovative. Yet every time he puts forward a creative idea, he is criticised for not following the guidelines. This double bind limits his ability to contribute effectively and creates a stressful work environment.
Resolution strategies
To navigate these toxic communications, systemic therapists use several approaches:
- Validating feelings: acknowledging and validating the person’s feelings in the face of contradictory messages.
- Psychoeducational explanation: making the double bind phenomenon explicit goes a long way towards gaining distance and finding relief.
- Expressing hidden needs: encouraging people to express the needs and feelings hidden behind the double bind.
- Reframing: helping to see the situation from a new, often less conflictual angle.
Conclusion
Understanding the double bind offers precious perspectives for improving personal and professional interactions. By identifying and untangling these paradoxical communications, each of us can reach greater clarity in our relationships and significantly reduce our inner conflicts.
To go further, you can read Une logique de la communication (“Pragmatics of Human Communication”) (see the book).
The episode devoted to the double bind — in French — can be watched below.
How to cite this article
Besse, J. (2024, May 12). The invisible trap of communication: understanding the double bind. Complexe Systémique. https://app.complexe-systemique.com/en_GB/articles/the-invisible-trap-of-communication-understanding-the-double-bind
To go further
- The double bind in the couple: when loving becomes a paradox"Heads I win, tails you lose": when the double bind settles at the heart of the love relationship.
- Pragmatics of human communication: a guided readingA reading guide to the founding work by Watzlawick, Helmick Beavin and Jackson.
- Pathological communications: defusing operationLearning to spot the styles of messages that poison relationships — and to defuse them.
Comments 0
Log in to join the discussion. Log in